Call Us Today! 1.555.555.555support@laplageservices.net
Dark Light

The third epidemiologic method is the experimental approach. A hypothesis is developed a

The third epidemiologic method is the experimental approach. A hypothesis is developed and an experimental model is constructed in which one or more selected factors are manipulated. The effect of the manipulation will either confirm or disprove the hypothesis. An example is the evaluation of the effect of a new drug on a disease. A group of people with the disease is identified, and some members are randomly selected to receive the drug. If the only difference between the two is the use of the drug, the clinical differences between the groups should reflect the effectiveness of the drug.

An epidemic investigation describes the factors relevant to an outbreak of disease; once the circumstances related to the occurrence of disease are defined, appropriate control and prevention measures can be identified. In an epidemic investigation, data are collected, collated according to time, place, and person, and analyzed and inferences are drawn.

In the investigation, the first action should be to confirm the existence of the epidemic by noting from past surveillance data the number of cases suspected and comparing this with the number of cases initially reported. Additionally, the investigator should discuss the occurrence of the disease with physicians or others who have seen or reported cases after examining patients and reviewing laboratory and hospital records. These diagnoses should then be verified. A case definition should be developed to differentiate patients who represent actual cases, those who represent suspected or presumptive cases, and those who should be omitted from further study. Additional cases may be sought or additional patient data obtained, and a rough case count made.

This initial phase consists basically of collecting data, which then must be organized according to time, place, and person. The population at risk should be identified and a hypothesis developed concerning the occurrence of the disease. If appropriate, specimens should be collected and transported to the laboratory. More specific studies may be indicated. Additional data from these studies should be analyzed and the hypothesis confirmed or altered. After analysis, control and

prevention measures should be developed and, as far as possible, implemented. A report containing this information should be prepared and distributed to those involved in investigating the outbreak and in implementing control and/or prevention measures. Continued surveillance activities may be appropriate to evaluate the effectiveness of the control and prevention measures.

The use of epidemiology to characterize a disease before its etiology has been identified is exemplified by the initial studies of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). The first cases came to the attention of the CDC late in 1981 when an increase was observed in requests for pentamidine for the treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. This initiated specific surveillance activities and epidemiologic studies that provided important information about this newly diagnosed disease. And an experimental model is constructed in which one or more selected factors are manipulated. The effect of the manipulation will either confirm or disprove the hypothesis. An example is the evaluation of the effect of a new drug on a disease. A group of people with the disease is identified, and some members are randomly selected to receive the drug. If the only difference between the two is the use of the drug, the clinical differences between the groups should reflect the effectiveness of the drug.

An epidemic investigation describes the factors relevant to an outbreak of disease; once the circumstances related to the occurrence of disease are defined, appropriate control and prevention measures can be identified. In an epidemic investigation, data are collected, collated according to time, place, and person, and analyzed and inferences are drawn.

In the investigation, the first action should be to confirm the existence of the epidemic by noting from past surveillance data the number of cases suspected and comparing this with the number of cases initially reported. Additionally, the investigator should discuss the occurrence of the disease with physicians or others who have seen or reported cases after examining patients and reviewing laboratory Page | 36

and hospital records. These diagnoses should then be verified. A case definition should be developed to differentiate patients who represent actual cases, those who represent suspected or presumptive cases, and those who should be omitted from further study. Additional cases may be sought or additional patient data obtained, and a rough case count made.

This initial phase consists basically of collecting data, which then must be organized according to time, place, and person. The population at risk should be identified and a hypothesis developed concerning the occurrence of the disease. If appropriate, specimens should be collected and transported to the laboratory. More specific studies may be indicated. Additional data from these studies should be analyzed and the hypothesis confirmed or altered. After analysis, control and

prevention measures should be developed and, as far as possible, implemented. A report containing this information should be prepared and distributed to those involved in investigating the outbreak and in implementing control and/or prevention measures. Continued surveillance activities may be appropriate to evaluate the effectiveness of the control and prevention measures.

The use of epidemiology to characterize a disease before its etiology has been identified is exemplified by the initial studies of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). The first cases came to the attention of the CDC late in 1981 when an increase was observed in requests for pentamidine for the treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. This initiated specific surveillance activities and epidemiologic studies that provided important information about this newly diagnosed disease.